8
Module 8 of 12
Skin Grafts
By Dr. Yehonatan Kaplan (M.D., Fellow ACMS)Published: 2026-03-10Updated: 2026-03-10Reviewed: 2026-03-10
Learning Objectives
- Differentiate FTSG and STSG by indications, technique, and outcomes
- Select appropriate donor sites for facial FTSG reconstruction
- Process and secure a full-thickness skin graft with bolster technique
- Understand graft survival physiology: imbibition, inosculation, revascularization
Graft Fundamentals
Skin grafts provide reliable wound coverage when primary closure or local flap reconstruction is not feasible or desirable. In dermatologic surgery, full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG) are preferred for their superior color and texture match compared to split-thickness grafts.
FTSG vs. STSG Comparison
Full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG) include the complete epidermis and full-thickness dermis, with all adnexal structures. Split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) include the epidermis and a variable portion of the dermis. The thickness of the graft determines its properties: thicker grafts contract less, match surrounding skin better, but have higher metabolic demands and lower take rates.
Key Points
- FTSG is the graft of choice for facial reconstruction in dermatologic surgery. Superior color, texture, and minimal contraction compared to STSG
- The tradeoff: FTSG has a higher metabolic demand and is more susceptible to graft failure if the wound bed is inadequate
| Property | Full-Thickness (FTSG) | Split-Thickness (STSG) |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | Epidermis + full dermis | Epidermis + partial dermis |
| Primary contraction | Minimal (10–20%) | Moderate (20–30%) |
| Secondary contraction | Minimal | Significant (30–50%) |
| Color/texture match | Excellent (when donor matched) | Poor (shiny, dyspigmented) |
| Metabolic demand | Higher | Lower |
| Graft take rate | Slightly lower | Higher (less demanding) |
| Donor site healing | Primary closure (ellipse) | Secondary intention (re-epithelialization) |
| Hair growth | May retain (if follicle-bearing donor) | Minimal |
| Sensation return | Partial (3–6 months) | Partial (variable) |
| Primary use in derm surgery | Facial reconstruction | Rarely used; large wounds, burns |
Graft Survival Physiology
Graft survival proceeds through three overlapping phases that require a well-vascularized wound bed and strict immobilization:
Clinical Pearls
- Immobilization during the inosculation phase (days 2–4) is the single most important factor in graft survival. Any shearing force disrupts the fragile vascular connections
- A well-vascularized wound bed is prerequisite for graft take. Granulation tissue, muscle, fascia, and perichondrium/periosteum all support graft survival
Important Warnings
- Grafts will NOT survive on avascular surfaces: bare cortical bone (without periosteum), bare cartilage (without perichondrium), bare tendon (without paratenon), or irradiated tissue with compromised vascularity
| Phase | Timeline | Mechanism | Clinical Significance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Imbibition (plasmatic) | Days 0–2 | Passive absorption of plasma from wound bed by capillary action; graft survives on diffusion | Graft appears pale/white; edematous; this is normal |
| Inosculation | Days 2–4 | Donor and recipient capillaries align and form direct connections | Graft begins to pink up; MOST CRITICAL phase for immobilization |
| Revascularization | Days 4–7+ | New blood vessels grow into the graft from the wound bed (neovascularization) | Graft becomes progressively pink/red; sensation begins to return at 6–8 weeks |
Indications in Dermatologic Surgery
FTSGs are indicated when:
• Primary closure is not possible (insufficient tissue laxity)
• Local flaps would distort free margins (eyelid, alar rim, lip)
• The defect is on a concave surface (medial canthus, conchal bowl, temple hollow) where flaps may tent or create unnatural contours
• The patient prefers a simpler, single-stage procedure over a flap
• The defect size is too large for local flap coverage
FTSGs are particularly well-suited for the medial canthus, nasal sidewall, conchal bowl, and eyelid. Concave surfaces where grafts settle into the contour naturally.
Full-Thickness Skin Grafts in Mohs Surgery
The success of a FTSG depends on three factors: appropriate donor site selection (color and texture match), meticulous graft processing (defatting), and secure immobilization (bolster technique).
Donor Site Selection
Choosing the right donor site is the most important decision in FTSG planning. The ideal donor provides skin that matches the recipient site in color, texture, thickness, and sebaceous quality.
Clinical Pearls
- The preauricular donor site is the workhorse for midface FTSG. Its color, texture, and sebaceous quality closely match the cheek and nasolabial area
- The postauricular donor site provides thin, pliable skin that is ideal for nasal reconstruction. The donor scar is hidden behind the ear
- For nasal tip grafts, the supraclavicular or postauricular sites provide the best match for the thick, sebaceous nasal skin
| Donor Site | Best Recipient Match | Graft Size | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preauricular | Cheek, perioral, nasal sidewall | Up to 3–4cm | Excellent color match for midface; easily hidden scar |
| Postauricular (retroauricular) | Nose, periorbital, ear | Up to 3cm | Thin skin; excellent match for nose; hidden donor scar |
| Supraclavicular | Forehead, scalp, large facial defects | Up to 5–6cm | Good color match; larger graft available; visible donor scar |
| Conchal bowl | Eyelid, nasal tip | Up to 2cm | Very thin skin; excellent for eyelid; cartilage support available for composite graft |
| Upper eyelid | Contralateral eyelid | Small (1–2cm) | Perfect thickness match; very limited supply |
| Inner upper arm | Large trunk/extremity defects | Large | Poor color match for face; reserved for non-facial sites |
Harvesting & Processing
Graft harvesting technique:
1. Create a template: use the foil from a suture package or a piece of sterile paper, press it into the defect, trim to exact size, and add 2–3mm on each side to compensate for graft contraction.
2. Transfer template to donor site: trace and mark the graft outline as an ellipse oriented along RSTLs of the donor site.
3. Harvest: incise the marked ellipse with a #15 blade and sharply dissect the graft from the underlying subcutaneous tissue. Close the donor site primarily in layers.
4. Degrease: this is the most critical processing step. Place the graft dermal-side up and meticulously remove all subcutaneous fat using sharp iris scissors. The goal is a smooth, glistening dermal surface with no visible fat lobules. Residual fat acts as a barrier to revascularization and is the most common cause of preventable graft failure.
5. Fenestrate: make small stab incisions (2–3mm) throughout the graft to allow drainage of blood and seroma fluid that would otherwise accumulate beneath the graft and prevent contact with the wound bed.
Important Warnings
- Incomplete defatting is the most common technical error in FTSG placement. Residual subcutaneous fat creates a barrier between the graft dermis and the wound bed vasculature, preventing inosculation
Securing & Bolster Technique
The graft must be immobilized against the wound bed to prevent shearing during the critical inosculation phase (days 2–4).
1. Suture the graft: place interrupted sutures (5-0 or 6-0 absorbable or nylon) around the perimeter, spacing evenly. Leave suture tails long (3–4cm) for bolster tie-over.
2. Build the bolster: shape a piece of cotton, Adaptic, or mineral oil-soaked gauze to match the graft dimensions. The bolster should provide firm, even pressure across the entire graft surface.
3. Tie over: use the long suture tails to tie the bolster firmly over the graft. The bolster should compress the graft uniformly against the wound bed.
4. Leave in place: the bolster remains for 5–7 days. Instruct the patient to avoid any manipulation of the site.
5. Bolster removal: at 5–7 days, carefully cut the tie-over sutures and remove the bolster. The graft should appear pink (viable) with early adherence to the wound bed.
Key Points
- The bolster provides two critical functions: immobilization (prevents shearing) and compression (eliminates dead space for hematoma/seroma)
- A well-constructed bolster should apply even pressure across the entire graft surface. Uneven pressure leads to localized graft failure
Special Graft Types & Complications
Beyond standard FTSG, composite grafts and secondary intention healing are important alternatives in the reconstructive surgeon’s toolkit.
Composite Grafts
Composite grafts contain skin and underlying cartilage (chondrocutaneous graft) or skin and fat. The most common application is reconstruction of alar rim defects after Mohs surgery.
Auricular composite graft: harvested from the antihelix, conchal bowl, or root of the helix. The graft includes skin on both surfaces with cartilage in between. It provides structural support and skin coverage simultaneously.
Size limitation: composite grafts should not exceed 1–1.5cm in greatest dimension. Larger grafts have unacceptably high failure rates because the cartilage component increases the metabolic demand while having no intrinsic blood supply.
The characteristic color changes in the first 48 hours are expected: the graft appears white initially (ischemia), then transitions to blue/purple (venous congestion), then gradually pinks up as revascularization occurs. This white-blue-pink sequence is normal and should not prompt intervention.
Clinical Pearls
- The white-to-blue-to-pink color progression in the first 48 hours after composite graft placement is normal. Do not mistake the blue/purple phase for graft failure
- Composite grafts from the conchal bowl or antihelix provide the best cartilage match for alar rim reconstruction. The natural curvature mimics the alar cartilage
- Keep composite grafts under 1.5cm. Larger grafts have significantly higher failure rates due to the avascular cartilage core
Graft Failure: Causes & Prevention
Understanding the causes of graft failure allows the surgeon to optimize technique and prevent complications.
Key Points
- Hematoma is the most common cause of graft failure. Meticulous hemostasis before graft placement is non-negotiable
- If partial graft loss occurs, do not remove the entire graft. The surviving portion provides wound coverage while the failed area heals by secondary intention beneath it
| Cause | Mechanism | Prevention |
|---|---|---|
| Hematoma | Blood collection separates graft from wound bed, blocking diffusion and inosculation | Meticulous hemostasis; fenestration; compression bolster |
| Seroma | Fluid collection lifts graft off wound bed | Fenestration; bolster compression; dependent drainage |
| Infection | Bacterial enzymes dissolve fibrin attachment | Sterile technique; avoid contaminated wounds; appropriate antibiotics |
| Shearing/movement | Disrupts fragile inosculation connections | Bolster dressing; patient education; immobilization |
| Poor wound bed | Insufficient vascularity for graft nutrition | Granulation tissue, muscle, fascia support graft; avoid bare bone/cartilage/tendon |
| Incomplete defatting | Fat layer blocks vascular ingrowth | Meticulous defatting until smooth dermal surface |
| Graft too thick | Excessive metabolic demand exceeds diffusion capacity | Full defatting; appropriate donor site selection |
Related Tools & Resources
References
- [1]Helm MF, Wirth PB. Skin grafts in dermatologic surgery: review of concepts and techniques. Dermatol Clin. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.det.2019.08.013
- [2]Robinson JK, Hanke CW, Siegel DM, Fratila A. Surgery of the Skin: Procedural Dermatology, 3rd Edition. Elsevier. 2019.
- [3]Zitelli JA, Moy RL, Abell E. Mohs Micrographic Surgery: Principles and Practice. Elsevier. 2015.
About This Article
Author: Dr. Yehonatan Kaplan, M.D., Fellow ACMS
Last Medical Review:
Audience: Dermatologic Surgeons
Clinic: Kaplan Clinic · DermUnbound Research Program