5
Module 5 of 12
Suture Materials & Selection
By Dr. Yehonatan Kaplan (M.D., Fellow ACMS)Published: 2026-03-10Updated: 2026-03-10Reviewed: 2026-03-10
Learning Objectives
- Classify sutures by absorbability, filament structure, and material composition
- Select appropriate suture material and size for specific anatomic sites and closure layers
- Compare tensile strength profiles and absorption timelines of common sutures
- Understand the TAFT framework for layered wound closure material selection
Classification of Suture Materials
Suture material selection is one of the most practical decisions in dermatologic surgery. The choice between absorbable and non-absorbable, monofilament and braided, and natural and synthetic materials directly affects wound healing, infection risk, and cosmetic outcome.
Absorbable vs. Non-Absorbable
Absorbable sutures are degraded by the body over time through hydrolysis (synthetic) or enzymatic degradation (natural/gut). They are used for buried (deep) sutures where removal is not practical. Non-absorbable sutures maintain tensile strength indefinitely and must be removed. They are used for epidermal (surface) closure where precise suture removal timing controls scar quality.
The key distinction: absorbable sutures are chosen for their tensile strength retention profile (how long they hold before weakening), while non-absorbable sutures are chosen for their handling properties and tissue reactivity.
Key Points
- Synthetic absorbable sutures degrade by hydrolysis. Predictable, consistent timeline regardless of tissue inflammation
- Natural gut sutures degrade by enzymatic proteolysis. Unpredictable, accelerated in inflamed or infected tissue
- Non-absorbable sutures on the skin surface must be removed to prevent permanent suture marks (railroad tracking)
Monofilament vs. Braided
Monofilament sutures consist of a single strand. They have less tissue drag, pass through tissue smoothly, and resist bacterial harboring. However, they have more memory (tendency to return to packaged shape), making knot security a consideration. Typically requiring 4–5 throws.
Braided (multifilament) sutures consist of multiple strands woven together. They handle better, have excellent knot security (3–4 throws), and are more pliable. However, the interstices between strands can harbor bacteria (wicking effect), increasing infection risk in contaminated wounds.
| Property | Monofilament | Braided |
|---|---|---|
| Tissue drag | Low (smooth passage) | Higher (more friction) |
| Knot security | Lower (more throws needed) | Higher (fewer throws) |
| Memory | Higher (springy) | Lower (pliable) |
| Infection risk | Lower (no wicking) | Higher (bacterial harboring) |
| Handling | Stiffer | Supple, easier to tie |
| Examples (absorbable) | Monocryl, PDS | Vicryl |
| Examples (non-absorbable) | Nylon, Prolene | Silk |
Natural vs. Synthetic
Natural sutures (gut, silk) generally provoke more tissue reactivity than synthetic materials. Gut sutures are derived from sheep or bovine intestinal submucosa and are degraded enzymatically. Chromic gut is treated with chromium salts to delay absorption. Silk is a braided natural protein with excellent handling but the highest tissue reactivity of any commonly used suture.
Synthetic sutures (polyglactin, poliglecaprone, polydioxanone, nylon, polypropylene) are engineered polymers with predictable degradation profiles and lower tissue reactivity. They have largely replaced natural sutures in modern dermatologic surgery.
Clinical Pearls
- Silk sutures should generally be avoided in dermatologic surgery due to their high tissue reactivity and infection risk. Nylon is preferred for surface closure
- Chromic gut retains tensile strength for approximately 21 days vs. 10 days for plain gut. Useful when slightly longer wound support is needed without the permanence of a synthetic absorbable
Commonly Used Sutures in Dermatologic Surgery
This section provides a practical reference for the suture materials most commonly encountered in cutaneous surgery, organized by absorbability.
Absorbable Sutures
Absorbable sutures are the workhorses of deep (buried) closure in dermatologic surgery. The critical parameter is tensile strength retention. How long the suture maintains its holding power before degradation weakens it.
Clinical Pearls
- Vicryl (polyglactin 910) is the most commonly used buried suture in dermatologic surgery. Its braided structure provides excellent knot security for inverted buried dermal placement
- Monocryl (poliglecaprone) has the least tissue reactivity among absorbable sutures. Preferred when minimizing inflammatory response is a priority
- PDS (polydioxanone) is chosen for high-tension closures (scalp, trunk) where prolonged wound support is needed. It maintains 50% tensile strength at 4–6 weeks
- Fast-absorbing gut is a game-changer for pediatric patients and facial closures. It falls out in 7–10 days, eliminating the suture removal visit
| Suture | Type | 50% Strength | Full Absorption | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) | Braided synthetic | 2–3 weeks | 56–70 days | Workhorse buried suture; excellent knot security; good handling |
| Vicryl Rapide | Braided synthetic | 5 days | 42 days | Fast-absorbing; useful for children, mucosa, superficial closure |
| Poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) | Monofilament synthetic | 7–14 days | 91–119 days | Smooth passage; less tissue reactivity; knot security requires 4+ throws |
| Polydioxanone (PDS) | Monofilament synthetic | 4–6 weeks | 183–238 days | Longest strength retention; ideal for high-tension closures |
| Polyglytone 6211 (Caprosyn) | Monofilament synthetic | 5–7 days | 56 days | Fast-absorbing monofilament; alternative to Vicryl Rapide |
| Plain gut | Monofilament natural | 7–10 days | 70 days | Enzymatic degradation; unpredictable in inflamed tissue |
| Chromic gut | Monofilament natural | 14–21 days | 90 days | Chromium-treated for delayed absorption; more reactivity than synthetics |
| Fast-absorbing gut | Monofilament natural | 5–7 days | 14–21 days | Falls out on its own; excellent for face/children; no removal visit needed |
Non-Absorbable Sutures
Non-absorbable sutures are used for epidermal (surface) closure and must be removed at the appropriate time to prevent suture marks.
Key Points
- Nylon is the standard surface suture in dermatologic surgery. Low reactivity, reliable strength, smooth passage through tissue
- Polypropylene is preferred for running subcuticular closure due to its smoothness and easy pull-through removal
Important Warnings
- Silk sutures should be avoided for cutaneous closure. Their high tissue reactivity and bacterial wicking lead to increased infection risk and poor scar quality
| Suture | Type | Tissue Reactivity | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nylon (Ethilon) | Monofilament synthetic | Very low | Gold standard for skin closure; excellent strength; smooth passage |
| Polypropylene (Prolene) | Monofilament synthetic | Lowest of all sutures | Inert; no tissue ingrowth; easy removal; ideal for running subcuticular |
| Silk | Braided natural | Highest | Best handling of any suture; poor for skin (high reactivity, infection risk) |
| Polybutester (Novafil) | Monofilament synthetic | Low | Unique elasticity; accommodates wound edema; less common |
Suture Selection by Site & Layer
Selecting the right suture requires matching the material properties to the specific anatomic site, tissue layer, and clinical scenario. The TAFT framework provides a systematic approach to layered wound closure.
Site-Specific Selection Guide
Suture size and material selection vary by anatomic location based on skin thickness, tension, and cosmetic demands.
Clinical Pearls
- Use 5-0 or 6-0 sutures on the face for fine, precise closure. Larger sutures leave more conspicuous marks
- On the trunk and extremities, 3-0 or 4-0 sutures provide the strength needed for higher-tension closures
- PDS is preferred over Vicryl for deep sutures in high-tension areas (scalp, trunk, joints) because of its longer tensile strength retention
| Anatomic Site | Deep Layer | Epidermal Layer | Suture Removal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Face (eyelid, nose, lip) | 5-0 Vicryl or Monocryl | 6-0 nylon or fast-absorbing gut | 5–7 days |
| Ear | 5-0 Vicryl | 5-0 nylon | 10–14 days |
| Scalp | 3-0 or 4-0 Vicryl/PDS | Staples or 3-0 nylon | 7–14 days |
| Neck | 4-0 or 5-0 Vicryl | 5-0 nylon | 7–10 days |
| Trunk | 3-0 or 4-0 Vicryl/PDS | 4-0 nylon | 10–14 days |
| Extremities | 4-0 Vicryl/PDS | 4-0 or 5-0 nylon | 10–14 days |
| Hands/feet | 4-0 or 5-0 Vicryl | 5-0 nylon | 14 days |
| Over joints | 4-0 PDS (prolonged support) | 4-0 nylon | 14 days |
The TAFT Framework
TAFT stands for Tension, Apposition, Finishing Touches. A conceptual framework for layered wound closure:
T. Tension Relief: Buried (deep) absorbable sutures eliminate dead space, approximate tissue layers, and relieve tension from the skin surface. This is the most critical layer. The buried vertical mattress with inverted knot is the cornerstone technique.
A. Apposition: Epidermal (surface) sutures precisely align the wound edges and achieve eversion. These sutures should bear ZERO tension. All tension was handled by the deep layer.
FT. Finishing Touches: Wound taping (Steri-Strips), adhesive, and dressing selection optimize the healing environment.
The TAFT framework emphasizes that a well-placed deep layer makes the surface closure almost effortless. If the surface sutures are under tension, more buried sutures are needed.
Key Points
- If the wound edges are not naturally approximating after deep suture placement, add more buried sutures before placing surface sutures
- Surface sutures should only appose. Never bear tension. Tension on surface sutures causes suture marks and widened scars
- On the face, if deep closure achieves excellent apposition, surface closure with Steri-Strips alone (no sutures) is a viable option
Needle Selection
Needle choice affects tissue trauma, ease of passage, and wound healing. The three main needle types used in dermatologic surgery:
Cutting needle: triangular cross-section with the cutting edge on the inner (concave) curvature. Good for tough tissue (palms, soles) but creates a track toward the wound edge that can promote suture pull-through.
Reverse cutting needle: cutting edge on the outer (convex) curvature. The standard choice for skin closure. The flat inner surface faces the wound edge, reducing the risk of suture pull-through.
Tapered (round) needle: no cutting edge; separates tissue fibers rather than cutting them. Used for deep fascial closure, subcutaneous tissue, and mucosa. Not effective for skin passage.
Key Points
- The reverse cutting needle (e.g., FS, PS needle designations) is the standard for all skin suturing. It minimizes suture pull-through compared to conventional cutting needles
- Tapered needles are reserved for deep tissue and mucosa. They cannot efficiently penetrate intact dermis
Related Tools & Resources
References
- [1]Park KY, Suh EJ, Koh IJ, et al. Suture materials and suturing techniques for cutaneous wound closure. J Cutan Med Surg. 2015. doi:10.1177/1203475415582089
- [2]Ashraf I, Butt E, Veitch D, Wernham A. Dermatological surgery: an update on suture materials and techniques. Part 1. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021. doi:10.1111/ced.14770 PMID: 34056751
- [3]Robinson JK, Hanke CW, Siegel DM, Fratila A. Surgery of the Skin: Procedural Dermatology, 3rd Edition. Elsevier. 2019.
About This Article
Author: Dr. Yehonatan Kaplan, M.D., Fellow ACMS
Last Medical Review:
Audience: Dermatologic Surgeons
Clinic: Kaplan Clinic · DermUnbound Research Program