Skip to main content

Fraga SD, Besaw RJ, Murad F, et al.
Dermatol Surg (2022)

JC: August 2022

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared recurrence rates of high-risk keratinocyte carcinomas (BCC and SCC) treated with complete margin assessment (CMA, as in Mohs micrographic surgery) versus standard excision with sectional assessment (SA). The analysis demonstrated significantly lower recurrence rates with CMA across all high-risk tumor categories, reinforcing the rationale for Mohs surgery in managing high-risk skin cancers. The study provides Level 1 evidence supporting NCCN guidelines recommending CMA for keratinocyte carcinomas with high-risk features.

Take-Home Messages

  • Complete margin assessment (Mohs) yields significantly lower recurrence rates than sectional assessment for high-risk keratinocyte carcinomas.
  • This meta-analysis provides Level 1 evidence supporting NCCN guidelines for CMA in high-risk BCC and SCC.
  • The recurrence benefit of CMA is consistent across all high-risk tumor subtypes and anatomical locations.

Topic

Margin Assessment & IHC

Frozen section interpretation, MART-1, immunohistochemistry stains

Related MohsPedia Articles

Abstract

Keratinocyte carcinomas (KCs) are the most diagnosed cancers worldwide and are commonly excised via complete margin assessment (CMA) or excision with sectional assessment (SA). National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines encourage CMA for KC with high-risk features. To systematically compare recurrence outcomes for CMA vs SA in high-risk KC based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines criteria. EMBASE and MEDLINE were searched for articles reporting recurrences of high-risk K

Literature review only. This summary is an editorial interpretation and may not reflect the complete findings of the original publication. Always refer to the full-text article for clinical decision-making.