Skip to main content

Kesty K, Sangueza OP, Leshin B, et al.
J Am Acad Dermatol (2017)

JC: February 2023

This comprehensive 17-year retrospective analysis of 1,421 Mohs surgery cases evaluated concordance between Mohs surgeons' intraoperative frozen section interpretations and independent dermatopathologist review. The study found a very high rate of agreement, with discordance occurring in only a small percentage of cases, primarily in subtle histologic patterns. The analysis provides robust quality assurance data supporting the reliability of Mohs surgeons' slide interpretation and highlights specific tumor types where enhanced vigilance is warranted.

Take-Home Messages

  • Mohs surgeon frozen section interpretation shows >97% concordance with independent dermatopathologist review across 1,421 cases.
  • Discordance is most common with subtle histologic patterns such as desmoplastic or perineural invasion patterns.
  • These findings support quality assurance protocols including periodic concordance audits in Mohs surgery practices.

Topic

Margin Assessment & IHC

Frozen section interpretation, MART-1, immunohistochemistry stains

Related MohsPedia Articles

Abstract

The success of Mohs micrographic surgery depends on the surgeon's ability to correctly interpret intraoperative frozen sections. This retrospective study analyzed the rate of concordance between Mohs surgeons and dermatopathologists in reading slides from Mohs surgery cases. A dermatopathologist reviewed all the frozen sections and the corresponding Mohs map for every 30th Mohs case at a practice employing 6 different Mohs surgeons during 2001-2017. Cases in which the dermatopathologist and th

Literature review only. This summary is an editorial interpretation and may not reflect the complete findings of the original publication. Always refer to the full-text article for clinical decision-making.