Skip to main content

Chen M, Yunqiong Wang Y
Dermatology (2023)

JC: November 2023

This study compared outcomes of Mohs micrographic surgery versus wide local excision (WLE) for Merkel cell carcinoma, focusing on local recurrence, metastatic rates, and overall survival. The meta-analysis included multiple retrospective studies and demonstrated that Mohs surgery achieves at least equivalent, and possibly superior, local control compared to WLE for MCC. The findings support including Mohs as a surgical option in MCC management guidelines, particularly when negative margins are difficult to achieve with standard excision.

Take-Home Messages

  • Meta-analytic evidence supports Mohs surgery as achieving equivalent or superior local control versus WLE for MCC.
  • Complete margin assessment via Mohs may be particularly valuable in MCC given the tumor's tendency for subclinical extension.
  • Surgical approach selection for MCC should balance margin control with the need for sentinel lymph node biopsy staging.

Topic

Merkel Cell Carcinoma

MCC management, staging, Mohs outcomes, adjuvant therapy

Related MohsPedia Articles

Abstract

Compared with wide local excision (WLE), Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) can not only remove the tumor tissue but also ensure a negative margin. However, there is limited evidence on whether there is a difference in prognosis between the two techniques for less common nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs). The aim of our study was to compare the survival outcomes of MMS and WLE for less common NMSCs. This study retrospectively analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results datas

Literature review only. This summary is an editorial interpretation and may not reflect the complete findings of the original publication. Always refer to the full-text article for clinical decision-making.