Skip to main content
MohsPedia/Tumor Types & Indications

Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Mohs Surgery & NCCN Management

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine skin cancer with rising incidence. Associated with Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) in approximately 80% of cases, MCC primarily affects older and immunosuppressed patients on sun-exposed sites. NCCN v2.2026 guidelines recognize Mohs micrographic surgery (PDEMA) as an appropriate surgical approach, alongside wide excision. This article covers epidemiology, clinical presentation, AJCC staging, the complete NCCN treatment algorithm including neoadjuvant immunotherapy, the specific role and considerations of Mohs in MCC, systemic therapy for advanced disease, and surveillance recommendations.

By Dr. Yehonatan Kaplan (M.D., Fellow ACMS)·Published: 2025-03-01·Updated: 2026-03-15·Reviewed: 2026-03-07
Merkel cell carcinomaMCCMohs surgeryneuroendocrineMCPyVimmunotherapyNCCN
Share

Overview & Epidemiology

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine tumor arising from mechanoreceptor Merkel cells or their progenitors in the basal layer of the epidermis. The incidence of MCC has increased approximately threefold over the past two decades, currently estimated at 0.7 per 100,000 person-years in the United States, making it roughly 30-40 times less common than melanoma. MCC predominantly affects older individuals (median age at diagnosis 75-80 years) and shows a strong male predominance (approximately 2:1 male-to-female ratio). Ultraviolet radiation is a major etiologic factor, as reflected by the predilection for sun-exposed sites. The head and neck region accounts for approximately 50% of cases, followed by extremities. Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) is clonally integrated in approximately 80% of MCC tumors and is considered a major oncogenic driver through expression of its large T and small T antigens. UV-associated (virus-negative) MCC tumors carry a very high tumor mutational burden, which has implications for immunotherapy responsiveness. Immunosuppression is a critical risk factor: solid organ transplant recipients carry an approximately 15-fold increased risk, and patients with HIV/AIDS or chronic lymphocytic leukemia are also at substantially elevated risk.

Clinical Presentation & Diagnosis

MCC typically presents as a firm, painless, rapidly growing papule or nodule on sun-exposed skin. The lesion is often dome-shaped with a smooth, shiny surface and characteristically displays a red, pink, or violaceous color. The clinical appearance is nonspecific, and MCC is frequently misdiagnosed initially as a cyst, lipoma, or other benign lesion. The AEIOU mnemonic captures the key clinical features: Asymptomatic (lack of tenderness), Expanding rapidly (doubling within 3 months), Immunosuppression, Older than 50 years, and UV-exposed site. Diagnosis requires histopathologic confirmation with immunohistochemistry (IHC), as MCC is a small round blue cell tumor that must be distinguished from other morphologically similar neoplasms. The hallmark IHC pattern is CK20-positive with a characteristic perinuclear dot-like staining pattern, combined with positivity for neuroendocrine markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin A). Critically, MCC is TTF-1 negative, which differentiates it from metastatic small cell lung carcinoma (TTF-1 positive). Additional markers include neuron-specific enolase and CD56. When clinical suspicion for MCC arises, a punch biopsy or incisional biopsy of sufficient depth should be performed, and IHC must be included in the pathology request.

Staging: AJCC 8th Edition

MCC is staged using the AJCC 8th Edition TNM system, which divides cases into stages I through IV. The staging system distinguishes between clinical staging (based on clinical and radiologic assessment) and pathological staging (incorporating sentinel lymph node biopsy results), which is important because pathologic nodal assessment significantly refines prognosis. Primary tumor (T) stage is determined by tumor size: T1 (maximum dimension 2 cm or less), T2 (greater than 2 cm but 5 cm or less), T3 (greater than 5 cm), and T4 (primary tumor invades fascia, muscle, cartilage, or bone). Nodal status is the single most important prognostic factor after primary tumor characteristics. Clinical node-negative patients who undergo SLNB with negative results have significantly better outcomes than those with clinically detected nodal disease. The NCCN v2.2026 guidelines emphasize that SLNB should be performed for all clinical stage I-II MCC to accurately stage the disease and guide adjuvant therapy decisions.
Prognostic FactorFavorableUnfavorable
Primary tumor size≤2 cm (T1)>2 cm (T2-T4)
Nodal statusPathologically node-negative (pN0)Node-positive (clinical or pathologic)
MCPyV statusMCPyV-positive (debated)MCPyV-negative (higher TMB)
Immune statusImmunocompetentImmunosuppressed (transplant, CLL, HIV)
Lymphovascular invasionAbsentPresent
Depth of invasionConfined to dermisExtension into subcutis or deeper
Distant metastasisAbsent (M0)Present (M1). Stage IV

Staging Workup

The initial staging workup for newly diagnosed MCC should include a thorough clinical examination of the primary tumor site and regional lymph node basins, as well as imaging to evaluate for regional and distant metastatic disease. NCCN recommends baseline imaging with CT or PET/CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis for all patients with MCC. PET/CT may be particularly useful given its sensitivity for detecting nodal and distant metastases. Brain MRI should be considered for patients with symptoms suggestive of central nervous system involvement. SLNB is a critical staging procedure for all clinically node-negative patients (stage I-II) and should be planned as part of the initial surgical management. Baseline MCPyV oncoprotein antibody (AMERK) titer, when available, can be obtained as a serologic biomarker for future recurrence monitoring in MCPyV-positive patients.

NCCN Treatment Algorithm (v2.2026)

The NCCN v2.2026 treatment algorithm for MCC reflects a multimodal approach that integrates surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy. A key update in v2.2026 is the inclusion of neoadjuvant immunotherapy (nivolumab) as an option for resectable MCC, based on emerging clinical trial data demonstrating pathologic complete response rates exceeding 50% in some series. The standard surgical approach remains wide excision with 1-2 cm clinical margins to investing fascia, or Mohs micrographic surgery / peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (PDEMA). SLNB is recommended for all clinical stage I-II patients, ideally performed at the time of definitive wide excision or coordinated with Mohs excision. Adjuvant radiation therapy plays a particularly strong role in MCC management. RT to the primary site and/or draining nodal basin is recommended for most patients, given the high locoregional recurrence rate of MCC. For node-positive disease, completion lymph node dissection or definitive RT to the nodal basin is indicated.
StageSurgerySLNBAdjuvant RTSystemic Therapy
I (T1N0)WLE 1-2cm or Mohs/PDEMARecommendedConsider for primary siteNot indicated
II (T2-T3N0)WLE 1-2cm or Mohs/PDEMARecommendedRecommended for primary siteNot indicated
III (any T, N+)WLE or Mohs + CLND or nodal RTDiagnostic (already N+)Recommended (primary + nodal)Consider adjuvant immunotherapy
IV (M1)Palliative excision if indicatedNot applicablePalliative RTFirst-line: pembrolizumab or avelumab

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy: New in v2.2026

NCCN v2.2026 introduces neoadjuvant immunotherapy as an option for patients with resectable MCC. The CheckMate 358 and other clinical trials have demonstrated that neoadjuvant nivolumab can produce pathologic complete responses in a substantial proportion of patients. This approach allows for assessment of tumor immunogenicity in vivo, potential downstaging of the primary tumor, and may reduce the extent of surgery required. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is particularly relevant for larger primary tumors or when surgical morbidity could be reduced by tumor shrinkage. However, it requires careful multidisciplinary discussion and should not delay definitive surgical management unnecessarily.

Surgical Excision

Definitive surgical excision of MCC involves wide local excision with 1-2 cm margins measured clinically, extending to the depth of the investing fascia. Mohs micrographic surgery or PDEMA is recognized by NCCN as an appropriate alternative that provides complete margin assessment with potential tissue conservation. The choice between wide excision and Mohs depends on tumor location, surgeon expertise, and the need for tissue conservation. Regardless of the surgical approach, the excision specimen should be evaluated for depth of invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and mitotic rate to inform staging and adjuvant therapy decisions.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

SLNB is recommended for all clinical stage I-II MCC patients. The positive SLNB rate is approximately 25-35%, and a positive SLNB substantially changes the stage grouping and treatment plan (adjuvant RT to nodal basin, consideration of systemic therapy). SLNB should be performed at the time of wide excision or coordinated with Mohs surgery. In MCC, SLNB is more prognostically significant than in many other skin cancers. A negative SLNB is associated with significantly improved disease-specific survival compared to clinically staged node-negative patients.

Adjuvant Radiation Therapy

Radiation therapy has a uniquely important role in MCC management, as MCC is a radiosensitive tumor with high locoregional recurrence rates after surgery alone. Adjuvant RT to the primary tumor bed is recommended for most patients, particularly those with positive or close margins, large primary tumors, lymphovascular invasion, or immunosuppression. RT to the draining nodal basin is recommended for SLNB-positive patients who do not undergo completion lymph node dissection. Even for patients with clear surgical margins and negative SLNB, adjuvant RT should be considered given the aggressive biology of MCC.

Role of Mohs Surgery in MCC

NCCN v2.2026 recognizes Mohs micrographic surgery (specifically PDEMA. Peripheral and deep en face margin assessment) as an appropriate surgical approach for MCC, equivalent to wide excision with 1-2 cm margins. Mohs/PDEMA provides the advantage of complete margin assessment, which is valuable in MCC given the potential for subclinical extension, particularly in anatomically constrained sites such as the head and neck where wide 1-2 cm margins may compromise critical structures. Studies have demonstrated that Mohs for MCC achieves local recurrence rates comparable to wide excision. However, the use of Mohs in MCC carries unique considerations that differ from its application in BCC or SCC.

Central Debulking Specimen for Permanent Sections

Unlike standard Mohs for BCC/SCC where the debulked tissue is discarded, in MCC the central debulking specimen MUST be submitted for vertical permanent section processing. This permanent section specimen provides critical staging information that is not obtainable from the Mohs en face frozen sections alone: tumor depth/thickness, presence or absence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), mitotic rate, and depth of invasion relative to anatomical structures. These histopathologic features directly influence AJCC staging, adjuvant therapy decisions, and prognosis. The Mohs surgeon should label the debulking specimen with orientation and submit it to dermatopathology as a separate specimen.

Coordination with SLNB

SLNB is a critical component of MCC management, and Mohs surgery must be coordinated with SLNB to avoid compromising lymphatic drainage mapping. Ideally, SLNB should be performed before or at the time of Mohs excision, as extensive local excision and flap reconstruction can disrupt lymphatic channels and reduce SLNB accuracy. The Mohs surgeon should coordinate with the surgical oncologist or head-and-neck surgeon who will perform the SLNB. In practice, a common workflow involves performing Mohs first to achieve clear margins, then proceeding to SLNB before definitive reconstruction. Alternatively, SLNB can be performed concurrently with the first Mohs stage using dual-team coordination.

Reconstruction Timing and RT Coordination

Because adjuvant RT is recommended for most MCC patients, the reconstruction plan must account for the anticipated radiation field. Complex flap reconstruction that will delay RT initiation should be avoided. Consider simpler closure methods (primary closure, grafts, or secondary intention) that allow timely commencement of RT within 4-6 weeks. If complex reconstruction is unavoidable, involve the radiation oncologist in preoperative planning to ensure the treatment timeline is not compromised.

Immunosuppression Considerations

Immunosuppression is one of the strongest risk factors for MCC development, aggressive behavior, and poor outcomes. Solid organ transplant recipients have an approximately 15-fold increased risk of developing MCC compared to the general population, and their tumors tend to present at a younger age, behave more aggressively, and carry a higher mortality rate. Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have an approximately 30-fold increased risk, likely related to both immune dysfunction and shared etiologic factors. HIV/AIDS patients are also at significantly elevated risk. When managing MCC in immunosuppressed patients, several modifications to the standard approach should be considered. In transplant recipients, discuss with the transplant team the possibility of reducing immunosuppressive medications. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to mTOR inhibitors (sirolimus/everolimus) has shown potential antitumor benefit in some studies. Closer follow-up intervals are warranted, with examinations every 3 months for the first 2 years. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors must be used with extreme caution in transplant recipients due to the risk of graft rejection, and decisions should involve the transplant team.

Systemic Therapy for Advanced MCC

Systemic therapy is indicated for patients with unresectable locoregional recurrence, in-transit metastases, or distant metastatic disease (stage IV). The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has transformed the treatment of advanced MCC. First-line systemic therapy consists of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors: pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) and avelumab (anti-PD-L1) are both FDA-approved for metastatic MCC and recommended as first-line agents by NCCN. Response rates vary by line of therapy: first-line pembrolizumab achieves an ORR of approximately 56%, while second-line avelumab (in chemotherapy-refractory disease) achieves an ORR of approximately 33%, with durable responses observed in a substantial proportion of responders in both settings. MCPyV-positive tumors and UV-associated (virus-negative) tumors with high mutational burden both respond well to immunotherapy, though through different mechanisms. Viral antigen presentation versus neoantigen load, respectively. For patients who progress on checkpoint inhibitors or who are not candidates for immunotherapy (e.g., transplant recipients), second-line chemotherapy with platinum-based regimens (cisplatin or carboplatin plus etoposide) can be considered. Chemotherapy produces response rates of 50-60% but responses are typically short-lived (median duration 3-8 months) and carry significant toxicity. Novel approaches under investigation include combination immunotherapy, adoptive T-cell therapy, and targeted agents.

First-Line Immunotherapy

Pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) and avelumab (anti-PD-L1) are the two NCCN-recommended first-line systemic agents for advanced MCC. Pembrolizumab is given at 200 mg IV every 3 weeks or 400 mg IV every 6 weeks. Avelumab is given at 800 mg IV every 2 weeks and was the first FDA-approved therapy specifically for metastatic MCC based on the JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial. First-line pembrolizumab achieves an ORR of approximately 56%, while avelumab achieves an ORR of approximately 33% in the second-line (chemotherapy-refractory) setting, with durable responses in many patients. Treatment is continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or completion of a defined treatment course (typically 2 years for pembrolizumab). Key immune-related adverse events to monitor include colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, thyroiditis, and adrenal insufficiency.

Second-Line Chemotherapy

For patients who progress on immunotherapy or who are not candidates for checkpoint inhibitors, platinum-based chemotherapy remains an option. The most commonly used regimen is cisplatin or carboplatin combined with etoposide, similar to protocols used for small cell lung carcinoma. Initial response rates are relatively high (50-60%), but responses are characteristically short-lived with a median duration of only 3-8 months. Chemotherapy carries significant myelosuppressive toxicity, particularly in the elderly population most affected by MCC. Given the inferior durability compared to immunotherapy, chemotherapy is reserved for second-line or later settings.

Prognosis & Follow-up

MCC carries a more aggressive prognosis than most cutaneous malignancies, with overall 5-year survival rates that vary significantly by stage. Localized disease (stage I-II) has a 5-year overall survival of approximately 50-65%, node-positive disease (stage III) approximately 35-40%, and distant metastatic disease (stage IV) approximately 14-18%. The majority of recurrences occur within the first 2-3 years after diagnosis, with approximately 40% of patients developing recurrence. Locoregional recurrence is most common, followed by distant metastasis to liver, bone, brain, lung, and skin. Given this recurrence pattern, NCCN recommends intensive surveillance with complete skin and lymph node examination every 3-6 months for the first 3 years after diagnosis, then every 6-12 months thereafter. Imaging (CT or PET/CT) should be considered for patients with high-risk features, node-positive disease, or those who have completed treatment for advanced disease. Patients should be educated about the signs of recurrence and the importance of adherence to the surveillance schedule.
AJCC Stage5-Year Overall SurvivalRecurrence RiskSurveillance Recommendation
I (T1N0, pathologic)60-65%Moderateq3-6 months x 3 years, then q6-12 months
IIA (T2-T3N0, pathologic)50-55%Highq3-6 months x 3 years, then q6-12 months; consider imaging
III (N+)35-40%Very highq3 months x 2 years, then q6 months x 3 years; imaging recommended
IV (M1)14-18%Very highPer oncology protocol; regular imaging
NCCN recommends a risk-adapted surveillance strategy for MCC. For all stages, thorough skin and lymph node examination should be performed every 3-6 months for the first 3 years, then every 6-12 months thereafter. For stage III and above, consider cross-sectional imaging (CT or PET/CT) every 6-12 months during the first 3 years to detect distant recurrence. Patients should be instructed to perform regular self-examination of the surgical site and regional lymph node basins. Any new nodule, lymphadenopathy, or unexplained symptoms should prompt urgent evaluation. For MCPyV-positive patients where baseline AMERK titers were obtained, serial antibody monitoring every 3-6 months may detect recurrence before it becomes clinically apparent.

Frequently Asked Questions

Recent Evidence

From the Northwestern Medicine Dermatologic Surgery Journal Club

No Difference in Survival for MCC After Mohs vs Wide Local Excision

Sharma AN, Demer AM · Dermatologic Surgery (2024)

Baseline Ultrasound and FDG-PET/CT Imaging in Merkel Cell Carcinoma (J Surg Oncol)

Zijlker LP, Bakker M, van der Hiel B, et al. · Journal of Surgical Oncology (2023)

MCC Facility Characteristics and Impact on Outcomes - Retrospective Cohort

Cheraghlou S, Agogo GO, Girardi M · Dermatologic Surgery (2023)

View all in Journal Club →
References
  1. [1] NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Merkel Cell Carcinoma v2.2026. NCCN Guidelines. .
  2. [2] Surgery of the Skin: Procedural Dermatology, 3rd Edition. Elsevier. .
  3. [3] Avelumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicentre, single-group, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. . doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30364-3
  4. [4] Merkel Cell Carcinoma. Dermatol Clin. . doi:10.1016/j.det.2022.07.015
  5. [5]paulson-2018-mcc-avelumab
  6. [6]shea-2018-mcc-mohs
  7. [7]knepper-2019-mcc-mohs-outcomes
  8. [8]becker-2020-mcc-immunotherapy-review
  9. [9]iyer-2022-mcc-retifanlimab

About This Article

Author: , Fellow ACMS

Last Medical Review:

Audience: Dermatologic Surgeons

Clinic: Kaplan Clinic · DermUnbound Research Program